On Being a Novice

When I first started this blog in April 2017 I was not a poet. All of my activity on The Used Life was centered on posts like this one: those with a decidedly philosophical bent aimed at exploring the nuances of human creativity and the art of living. It wasn’t until later—sometime in early 2018—that I decided to try my hand at poetry, albeit for the second time in my life. And since then, I’ve dedicated myself to my craft wholeheartedly. I have studied extensively artists from a diversity of backgrounds, conducted various experiments in style and voice, and attempted to fuse my love of music, psychology, philosophy, and the visual arts with various modes of storytelling and poetic expression. I’ve even published my first chapbook. In short, I eat, sleep, and breathe poetry. It’s the most soulful form of self-expression of which I am capable. My whole personality in action. Yet, I am new at it. And sometimes I don’t feel like a real poet at all (more on that below).

But as I reflect on my journey thus far, I realize that some of my greatest and most fulfilling moments as a poet were those in which I was a truly a novice. Trying things I’d never tried with language before. Things I never knew I was capable of. And all while having no idea what I was doing or where I was going. How glorious! Indeed, the more I write and, consequently, the more I get in my head about writing, the more desirable being a novice becomes. That is, the more I recognize being a novice as a state of mind. As one who values the importance of preserving the magic of being new at something. It’a perspective that’s touched by innocence, I think. A real sense of adventure, of innovation, of play, and more importantly, of humility and reverence for one’s craft. It’s then I begin thinking that the day I feel like an expert poet is probably the day I should stop writing altogether. 

Here are some thoughts on the benefits of being a perennial novice:

A novice is free(r) of self-conscious restraints.

These days, I begin most of my poetic exercises (including those that never become poems published here or elsewhere) by forcing myself to act as a novice. My mantra: write as if you don’t know better. Lest I fall victim to the rules, real or imagined. I try to begin without preconceived ideas (or as few as possible, anyway), which I accomplish by placing limits on myself. For the first stanza, say, I only allow myself to use certain words or images—those I grab from the book nearest me, whichever window is open on my laptop screen, or even a playlist I happen to be listening to. I have no idea what those words will become or in which direction they’ll take me. But it’s a hell of a ride. Because in those moments I am playing most freely. I am wholly absorbed. Being entirely spontaneous and lost in the process of creating something new. That is, I’m flying. Ants on Parade was written that way. As was Zero Hour. 

Interestingly, I find that’s when my inner visions really begin to take shape. And it’s almost effortless. I work without a single care for what I should be saying or how I should be saying it. Or, for that matter, what particular point I should be making (for me, the single greatest creative buzzkill and the reason I refuse to analyze my own work). Indeed, I find the most unexpected and fulfilling outcome of exercises like this is that the points that need to be made make themselves. And in ways that are far more inventive and elegant than my intellect alone could ever have designed.

actor cabaret in black

Novices are freer to be who they are. 

It’s true that I only recently started writing poetry again after a 20-year hiatus. But it’s also true that I have been writing since I was first able. I have vague memories of my mother sitting with me and teaching me to read very early on. And of the short stories I used to write when I was 6 and 7 years old. As I got older, of course, my interests (writing and otherwise) got more complicated. I was never quite sure where I belonged, first as a student and then as a professional. 

I always felt my interests straddled too many lines. Crossed too many unconventional barriers. And I didn’t really “fit” in a particular field. Indeed, when I started this blog, I thought psychology might be the direction I was heading in, but the more I focused on my poetry, the less I began to see the delineations between “writer” and “psychologist.” 

Indeed, my friend, Tim, brought this issue back to the forefront of my attention just the other day in a comment he left on a recent post: “You seem to understand my own feelings in ways I often don’t. And then you write your thoughts down in ways that make mine seem to make so much more sense.” 

My response: “That is a writer’s job, I imagine, the primary job…I also think that is the point at which writer and psychologist are one and the same.”

When I am creating, those barriers don’t exist. And they are of absolutely no use to the imagination. It’s then I realize there is more than one way to become who you are. Because, in those moments, I forget, at least temporarily, that those categories and arbitrary delineations exist in the first place. I act as if I don’t know better, as a novice would. And focus on the purity of self-expression instead—or rather, I allow myself the privilege of expressing myself fully. Then, many of these issues seem to resolve themselves. 

A perennial novice recognizes the value of “not knowing.”

Which is something I am currently working on. I’d be lying if I didn’t say that I often suffer from bouts of what’s commonly called “impostor syndrome.” That doesn’t mean I am not proud of my work. Or that I don’t think it has merit. Or that I think I’m lacking in ability. But it does mean I’ve got this crazy idea that I’m not a real poet. As if there’s a club somewhere that I am not part of. And that only real, serious poets belong to. 

I can tell you now that one of the biggest reasons I feel this way is that (gulp) I don’t read contemporary poetry. In fact, outside of the handful of poets I’ve chosen to study intensively, I don’t read poetry at all. I have read more poetry here on WordPress over the past few years than I probably have in the last decade. There. Phew. I said it. I am a poet who doesn’t read (much) poetry. I prefer to read psychology books and listen to music. I study mostly with my ears. And I don’t give any thought to proper poetic forms. I wouldn’t know what most of them are without looking them up in a glossary of literary terms. Now I really feel like a fraud.

Just last night, as I was looking through Poet’s Market 2020 for prospective magazine/journal submissions, I had the unfortunate experience of coming across a series of journals that boasted lists of their recently published poets. Surely a distinguished series of names. Not that I know the difference since I don’t read contemporary poetry. In that moment, I was crippled by a thought: Oh, God! I can’t submit my work there! I don’t even know those poets’ names! They’ll find out. They’ll find out I’m not one of them. 

Except I cannot allow myself to actually be crippled by that thought (a promise I made to myself in the new year). But it was enough to stop me dead for a few moments. Until I realized I can’t be different. I can’t make my interests or my imagination be different. And I really don’t want to. It wouldn’t be any fun then. So, I guess I’ll keep on being a poet who doesn’t read poetry. And who, by all measures, has no idea what she’s doing. Quite possibly the more courageous alternative.

15 thoughts on “On Being a Novice

  1. I have the same with my Cornish Bear photography persona, a photographer who doesn’t particularly follow any others photography. Even a featuring on WordPress ‘Discover’ didn’t really convince me that my work was ‘serious’.
    As Bryntin I dabble with simple and known poetry structures in general, it keeps my umm… looser tendencies under control. But I did enjoy letting go a bit today, which I am pleased to see you saw and commented on. No idea if it was ‘a poem’, I just felt a rhythm and a mood to write along to.
    Anyway, I love your work and its imagery, even though I’m too simple for analysing it in any depth. It just feels good to read and that’s all I can measure it by.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Well, you have given me a wonderful compliment. Thank you! All I ever want to do is write poetry that’s fun to read. I am afraid I don’t have a nobler objective than that. Not out to change the world, champion a cause, question the nature of being, or anything like that. Just write the kind of poetry I’d like to read and have fun doing it.

      I think it’s interesting you have a similar perspective with regard to photography. I wonder what it takes to convince us that we’re “serious” at what we do…Thanks again for the comment, and Happy New Year. 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Poetry is a journey
    for the freedom rider
    It is poetry’s business
    to be dangerous
    A flame burning brighter
    The bold novice
    making a choice
    to be Liberty’s voice
    Not bound up like a mouse
    A lover on the beat
    and a mean street fighter

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I love reading your writing. It’s so truthful. What comes to mind is that on a good writing day I often feel that I’m writing for the first time, as if I’d never experienced the experiment with pen and paper before.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. I like to feel like a novice because I then don’t need to feel like something needs to be polished to perfection before I send it out into the world. Otherwise I would hold onto it forever and never let anyone enjoy it which is unfair of everyone!

    Liked by 1 person

  5. Your experience with poetry, reminds me of my own with art – specifically that I’m not really interested in other artists work in my area, but prefer to take delight and immerse myself in art from the past! And when I was looking through literary magazines to send short stories to, as you are supposed to do as a ‘novice’ writer, the fancy trendy titles of the stories they had published made me feel inadequate, thinking ‘Why don’t I come up with weird titles, where is my imagination?’ But the fact is those titles didn’t attract me as a reader at all! It was a very difficult time for me and I questioned my faith in my own writing, just like I questioned my faith in myself as an artist when I saw what was on trend and here I was adoring rendering the details of the natural world in the middle of abstract landscapes being in fashion. Life is just too short for all this, novice or not, we own it to ourselves to simply do what we do and follow our inner light and spirit, and all those lovely possibilities.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I couldn’t agree more, Lynne! And thank you for sharing. I had a similar experience as I was reflecting on that sort of nervous, sinking feeling I had after looking at all of those journals. My experience with contemporary poetry is, really, limited to that which I was forced to read in graduate school, now, about 10 years ago. And you know what? I didn’t like most of it. I found it to be rather boring and stuck on itself. Not that I could say that in a roomful of serious literature students, but it was no fun reading the stuff. So I thought, why do I care what other poets whose work, in all likelihood, is of the type I read in school and didn’t like, think of my poetry? Well, when I look at itlike that, I guess I should be proud to be a novice. And I think you’re right: the world needs our individual talents a whole lot more than it needs what’s trendy or popular. Thanks again!

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s